Gonzaga, Grams. C., Haselton, M. G., Smurda, J., Davies, Yards. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Advancement and you may Human Conclusion, 29(2), 119–126.
Cross-sectional studies from closeness, hobbies, and you may relationship: Research the assumptions of your own triangular theory out-of like
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Meters. (2000). The area away from accessory in the individual mating. Article on Standard Psychology, 4(2), 186–204.
Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A great. (2002). Internet paradox reviewed. Record from Societal Affairs, 58(1), 49–74.
Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, Meters., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Sites paradox: A social technical one decreases personal involvement and you will mental better-becoming? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
Kreider, R.M., & Fields, J. Yards. (2001). Count, time, and time of marriages and you may divorces. Most recent People Reports, 70-80, (Arizona, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, 2005).
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Elizabeth. (2004). Perception most readily useful on creating tough: Public comparisons contained in this romantic relationships. Log out-of Identity and you will Societal Therapy, 87(1), 80–95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A beneficial., & Gailliot, Meters. T. (2009). Diary regarding Identification and you can Personal Mindset, 97(1), 74–87.
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A., & Gonzaga, G. C. (2008). Automated inattention so you can glamorous choices: Brand new developed psychology regarding dating maintenance. Advancement and you can Individual Conclusion, 29(5), 343–349.
pold, B. Age. (1981). Sequential data from conflict and you will agreement in upset and nondistressed relationship lovers. Diary out-of Contacting and you will Systematic Therapy, 49(4), 554–567.
McKenna, K. Y. A good., Green, An excellent. S., Gleason, Yards. J. (2002). Dating creation on the internet: What’s the larger interest? Diary away from Personal Activities, 58(1), 9–31.
Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. Grams., & Griffin, D. W. (1996). The many benefits of self-confident illusions: Idealization and build off fulfillment from inside the personal matchmaking. Journal of Personality and you will Public Mindset, 70(1), 79–98.
Neff, L. A., & http://datingmentor.org/escort/elk-grove Karney, B. R. (2002). Self-testing objectives in the intimate matchmaking: A style of global enhancement and you may particular verification. Inside the P. Noller & J. An effective. Feeney (Eds.), Knowledge ents regarding study of couples communications (pp. 32–58). Nyc, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Intrasexual vigilance: The fresh implicit knowledge away from romantic competition
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The introduction of the customer-counselor thread through the contact lens out-of accessory theory. Psychotherapy: Concept, Research, Routine, Degree, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Brand new societal monitoring program: Enhanced susceptibility to social cues once the a transformative reaction to societal exception to this rule. In K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), New societal outcast: Ostracism, public exception to this rule, rejection, and you can bullying (pp. 213–226). Nyc, NY: Therapy Press.
Penetrate, T., & Lydon, J. Age. (2001). Around the world and certain relational designs on the connection with societal affairs. Log away from Identification and you can Societal Mindset, 80(4), 613–631.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. An effective., Tran, S., ). Accessory and you will pointers trying to when you look at the personal relationship. Identity and Public Therapy Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.
Ross, L. R., & Spinner, B. (2001). Standard and particular connection representations inside adulthood: Will there be a romance?. Record From Societal And private Matchmaking, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, Letter., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. An effective. (2001)mitment and you can relationship repairs components. Inside the J. Harvey & Good. Wenzel (Eds.), Intimate close relationships: Restoration and you can improvement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, A great. D. (2000). Projection in person impact one of partners as the a function of new similarity in their shared experience. Identification And you will Public Mindset Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, Yards. P. (1980). Aftereffects of salience from extrinsic perks toward liking and loving. Journal off Personality and you may Public Therapy, 38(3), 453–460.