The info showed is actually 
obtained inside the framework off greater look strategies, hence consisted of a detailed sociodemographic and you will matchmaking analysis, along with other scales inside range of close matchmaking
Depending on the full duration of the partnership, the common, in years, to the other statuses explained is, respectively: dos.89 (SD = 2.27); 4.94 (SD = 2.97), each other communities varying ranging from half a year and you may eleven many years of relationship; seven.76 (SD = cuatro.01), ranging from a couple of and you can 19 ages; and you can (SD = cuatro.82), ranging from below a year and you can 31 age. 8%) and you may stayed having friends, when you find yourself people coping with its lovers was primarily operating some one (69.2%), at which 53% got college otherwise postgraduate stages. Of your own formal connection participants, 67% got school otherwise post-scholar amounts, at which 89.8% was basically operating, 2% resigned and you will 8.2% out of work. The functional disease with the married members are comparable: 89.5% had been functioning, dos.9% were resigned and 6.3% was basically underemployed, and you can 1.3% known another a career status. Contained in this class, 62.5% of the people got college or university otherwise postgraduate level.
Private commitment is evaluated with regards to the Portuguese type (Desk 1) of your own less kind of the newest Persistence Measure (Stanley, 1986), that was interpreted with respect to the adopting the interpretation and you will retroversion tips: once consent received from the creator, the first measure try interpreted by the several experts in industry, these two translations was subjected to retroversion by the a couple of gurus, one to bilingual and something proficient in the utilization of the brand new English language; eventually, for each variation was compared to new level, opting for the employment of the fresh words and you may activities which have deeper proximity so you can it. The fresh Portuguese type hence consisted of the new 14 original situations and you can an identical answer level and you can try named, immediately following deliberation by the party, the private Connection Measure (‘Escala de- Compromisso Pessoal’–ECP). On the latest stage of the translation techniques, this new means are applied to three people toward purpose of verifying the fresh adequateness of your vocabulary together with unambiguous knowledge of the things, which were chatted about toward professionals immediately following applying of brand new questionnaire. Because there was in fact zero comments saying otherwise, those things remained a comparable.
As a consequence of an inform of your unique Davis (1996, cited for the Lind, 2008) measure, which means is intended to level relationships high quality perception, with the hope one, depending on the theoretic assumptions, both balances often seriously associate
Relationship Quality, chosen to verify criteria validity, was measured with the Relationship Rating Form–Revised (RRF-R; Davis, 1996, adapt. by Lind, 2008). The items are presented in the form of questions that the subjects will answer according to a rating scale of 1 (not at all) to 9 (completely or extremely). The Portuguese version consists of a total of 46 items grouped in four dimensions: Passion, Confidence, Conflict and Intimacy. The RRF-R revealed psychometric properties ranging from good to excellent, obtaining an excellent internal consistency at the total scale level, with Cronbach’s alpha values between .97 and .98, for women and men respectively, and .81 and .97 at subscale level, a good temporal stability (significant correlations ranging between .70 and .87; p < .01) and high concurrent validity with a marital satisfaction scale (significant global score correlations between .88 and .85, for women and men respectively; p < .01). In the current sample, the RRF-R presented for the total scale, an excellent Cronbach's alpha of .96; .94 for the Passion subscale, .93 for Confidence, .77 for Conflict and .83 for Intimacy. The internal consistency of the total scale remained excellent for the four subsamples: .95 for participants in a dating relationship, .94 for those in a dating relationship with cohabitation and .97 for participants in both formal unions and married relationships.